Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai v....

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai v. Shri J.n. Virji

High Court 29 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai v. Shri J.n. Virji
Date of order
29 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai v. Shri J.n. Virji, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-#-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.275 of 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.48 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Shri J.N. Virji ..Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterji with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. P.J. Pardiwala with Ms. Chitra Rao i/b. M. & M. Legal Ventures for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 29th October, 2007 CORAM: F.I. REBELLO J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 29th October, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . The delay is less than 200 days. Considering the practical difficulties which the Department was facing including referring the matters to the Law Department, Government of India for drafting the Appeal Memo and considering the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in our opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. The Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Office to register the Appeal. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan