The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.mohanlal Hansraj Jain
High Court
05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.mohanlal Hansraj Jain
Date of order
05 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.mohanlal Hansraj Jain, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.685 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.685 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.685 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax, mumbai .. Appellant
v/s
Shri.Mohanlal Hansraj Jain .. Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. In view of disposal of the Notice of Motion
No.2064/2003, the learned Counsel for the Appellant
seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Hence, Appeal is
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as
per the rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue