The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.mohanlal Hansraj Jain
High Court
05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.mohanlal Hansraj Jain
Date of order
05 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.mohanlal Hansraj Jain, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2064 OF 2003ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.685 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. AppellantV/sShri.Mohanlal Hansraj Jain.. RespondentMr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
P.C.:
1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave towithdraw the Notice of Motion since the question of lawinvolved in the Appeal is squarely covered by thejudgment of the Supreme Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income Tax V/s.D.P.Sandu Bros.- (2005)273 ITR 1, against the Revenue. Hence, Notice of Motionis allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue