The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur-1 v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka
High Court
09 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur-1 v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka
Date of order
09 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur-1 v. Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 mca793.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
M. C. A. NO.793 OF 2015
IN
I. T. A. NO.94 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-1
-vs.-
Sanjay Ishwarlal Ranka
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. Anand Parchure, counsel for the applicant.
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK &PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
DATED:09.10.2015.
No ground has been made out for reviewing the order, dated 25/06/2015, as the same is based on an order, dated 24/10/2013 in Income Tax Appeal No.8 of 2013. It is fairly stated on behalf of the Department that neither has the Department filed a review application seeking the review of the order, dated 24/10/2013 in Income Tax Appeal No.8 of 2013, nor has the Department challenged the order, dated 24/10/2013 in a Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. If the issue involved in both the income tax appeals is the same, there is no reason for reviewing the order that is based on the previous order in which it is observed that no substantial question of law is involved. The review application stands rejected.
KHUNTE
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.