The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Bharat Industrial Works, Nagpur
High Court
03 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Bharat Industrial Works, Nagpur
Date of order
03 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Bharat Industrial Works, Nagpur, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION T. NO.9/2012INI.T.R. NO.357/1995 (D)
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur...Versus...M/s Bharat Industrial Works, Nagpur
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for applicant Shri N.J. Thakkar, Adv. for respondent
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.
DATE : 03.08.2012
Heard.
No case is made out for review of the order dated 15.10.2010 as the statement of the Revenue that the tax effect involved in the reference was less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes was in fact correctly made and the reference was rightly returned unanswered in consonance with the law laid down in the judgment reported in (2010) 229 CTR (Bom) 77. Merely because the Hon'ble
0308cat9.12.odt
Supreme Court had granted liberty to the Department in some other matter to move the High Court by way of review, it would not be proper to review the order in this case. The civil application is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
ssw
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.