Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur

High Court 03 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur
Date of order
03 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION T. NO.5/2012IN I.T.R. NO.100/1993 (D) The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur...Versus... M/s Khare & Tarkunde, Nagpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for applicant S/Shri Dewani, N.S. Bhattad, Advs. for respondent CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 03.08.2012 Heard. No case is made out for review of the order dated 28.10.2010 as the statement of the Revenue that the tax effect involved in the reference was less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes was in fact correctly made and the reference was rightly returned unanswered in consonance with the law laid down in the judgment reported in (2010) 229 CTR (Bom) 77. Merely because the Hon'ble 0308cat5.12.odt Supreme Court had granted liberty to the Department in some other matter to move the High Court by way of review, it would not be proper to review the order in this case. The civil application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE ssw
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan