Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. The Progressive Carriers, Kamptee

High Court 27 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. The Progressive Carriers, Kamptee
Date of order
27 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. The Progressive Carriers, Kamptee, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. INCOME TAX APPEAL (itl) No. 73 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur v. The Progressive Carriers, Kamptee ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coramappearances, Court’s orders or directionsand Registrar’s orders. Courts’s or Judge’s orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coram : B.P .Dharmadhikari and V.M.Deshpande,JJ. Date : 27th JANUARY, 2016 Heard Advocate Mohta for the appellant. Assessment Year involved in the present appeal is 1990-1991 to 2000-2001 and tax effect is Rs.15,03,262/-. Hence, we find that it is covered by Circular No.21/15 dated 10.12.2015 issued by CBDT. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Registry to refund proportionate court-fee to the appellant. JUDGE JUDGE /TA/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan