Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nashik v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nashik v. M/S Sunder Automobiles, Dhule

High Court 04 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nashik v. M/S Sunder Automobiles, Dhule
Date of order
04 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nashik v. M/S Sunder Automobiles, Dhule, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 76 of 2007 and 78 of 2007, the Appeal is not maintainable and is therefore dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABADFARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. TAX APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2009 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik VS M/s Sunder Automobiles, Dhule) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General, for the Appellant-Union of IndiaMr. S.P. Shah, Advocate for the respondent ... P.C.:- CORAM :SMT. NISHITA MHATRE &M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 04.08.2011 1. Admittedly, the tax effect in this Appeal is` 2,26,603/-, i.e. less than ` 10,00,000/-. In view of our decision dated 29.7.2011 in Tax Appeal nos. 76 of 2007 and 78 of 2007, the Appeal is not maintainable and is therefore dismissed. Sd/-Sd/- [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan