The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji-Goa v. M/S. Oceanic Paints Pvt. Ltd
High Court
02 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji-Goa v. M/S. Oceanic Paints Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
02 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji-Goa v. M/S. Oceanic Paints Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2002
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI-GOA. VersusM/S. OCEANIC PAINTS PVT. LTD.,
... Appellant
... Respondent
Mr. S. R. Rivankar, Advocate for the Appellant.
P.C.:-
-Coram:P. B. MAJMUDAR &N. A. BRITTO, JJ.-Date:2nd February, 2009
During the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the Appellantsubmitted that the tax effect in the present appeal is for Rs.2,06,018/- andas per the Circular of the Department it has been decided not to file taxwhere the Tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-. The Division Bench ofthis Court has held that the Circular is applicable to pending appeals also.In view of this, this appeal is not required to be entertained. Hence, thesame is dismissed in view of the fact that the Tax effect is less thanRs.4,00,000/-.
P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.
RD.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue