The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Damodar Mangalji Mining Co
High Court
01 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Damodar Mangalji Mining Co
Date of order
01 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. Damodar Mangalji Mining Co, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 912 OF 2018INTAX APPEAL NO. 58 OF 2006
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI.,
Versus
... Applicant
DAMODAR MANGALJI MINING CO.,
... Respondent
Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Petitioner.Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent.
-Coram:N. M. JAMDAR &
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ.
-Date:1st November 2018
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. For the reasons stated in the application and the orderpassed on 4 August 2018,the application is allowed. The Appealstands restored to the file to be placed on the final hearing boardas per its own turn.
3. As regards the averment made in the application which
relates to the merits of the Appeal, the same is kept open forconsideration at the time of hearing of the Appeal.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
N. M. JAMDAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue