The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. K. L. Wadane, Jj
High Court
20 Jul 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. K. L. Wadane, Jj
Date of order
20 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji v. K. L. Wadane, Jj, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: 39 of 2015, we find that there are nosubstantial questions of law which arise in the present Appeal forconsideration of this Court and, consequently, the Appeal stands rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2015
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANAJI. Versus
SMT. SHERIN ANTAO.
... Appellant
... Respondent
Ms. Asha A. Desai, Advocate for the Appellant.
-Coram:F. M. REIS &-Date:20th July, 2015
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
P.C.
Heard Ms. Desai, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant.
2. The learned Counsel pointed out that the above Appealchallenges the Orders in respect of the spouse of the Assessee in TaxAppeal No.39 of 2015. Learned Counsel further pointed out that thefacts in the present case are identical in the facts of the said TaxAppeal No. 39 of 2015 and in fact the learned Commissioner of theIncome Tax as well as the learned Appellate Tribunal disposed of theproceedings by identical Orders.
3. For the reasons stated in the Order dated 06.07.2015, whilstdisposing of Tax Appeal No. 39 of 2015, we find that there are nosubstantial questions of law which arise in the present Appeal forconsideration of this Court and, consequently, the Appeal stands
rejected.
K. L. WADANE, J.
arp/*
F. M. REIS, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue