The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/S Gymkhana Club, Panchkula
High Court
30 Nov 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/S Gymkhana Club, Panchkula
Date of order
30 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/S Gymkhana Club, Panchkula, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 420 of 2006
Date of Decision: 30.11.2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
....Appellant.
Versus
M/s Gymkhana Club, Panchkula
...Respondent.
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN.
1.Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
PRESENT: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate and
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
For orders, see ITA No. 690 of 2005 (The Commissioner
of Income Tax, Panchkula v. M/s Gymkhana Club, Panchkula).
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
November 30, 2015
gbs
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue