The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. Shri Karanbir Singh, Patiala
High Court
18 Nov 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. Shri Karanbir Singh, Patiala
Date of order
18 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. Shri Karanbir Singh, Patiala, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Issue: Savita Saxena, Advocatefor the appellant.None for the respondent RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ChandigarhBench, Chandigarh, has referred the following question of law,for an answer:- “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the ITAT was right in law in...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Income Tax Reference No.20 of 1999
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Income Tax Reference No.20 of 1999 Date of Order: 18.11.2013.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala
...Appellant
Versus
Shri Karanbir Singh, Patiala
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Present: Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocatefor the appellant.None for the respondent
RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ChandigarhBench, Chandigarh, has referred the following question of law,for an answer:-
“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the ITAT was right in law in holdingthat the amount enhanced compensation andinterest thereon received by the assessee inconsequence of the judgment of the Distt. Judgeand the amount having been utilised, invested indiscretion of the assessee, is not taxable?”Counsel for the revenue fairly concedes that question
Income Tax Reference No.20 of 1999
of law has already been answered against the revenue inCommissioner of Income Tax v. Karanbir Singh, [2008] 303
ITR 231 (P&H).
In view of the statement made by counsel for therevenue, the reference is answered in terms of the aforesaidjudgment.
(RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE
November 18, 2013
nt
(DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.