Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. The Roadmaster Industries Of India (P) Limited, Rajpura

High Court 27 Oct 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

27 Oct 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. The Roadmaster Industries Of India (P) Limited, Rajpura, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: Reference is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITR No. 29 of 1981 (O&M)Date of decision: October 27, 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala ...Appellant Versus The Roadmaster Industries of India (P) Limited, Rajpura ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: None for the revenue. Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate, for the assessee. ORDER This order may be read in continuation of order dated17.9.2004 by the Division Bench and order dated 3.7.2009 by the FullBench. In view of the judgment of the Full Bench dated 3.7.2009 in Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Roadmaster Industries of India(P.) Limited, [2009] 315 ITR 66 (P&H), the questions referred areanswered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Reference is disposed of accordingly. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE October 27, 2009 prem (GURDEV SINGH ) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.