The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pondicherry v. Sri Vineet Chudiwala
High Court
28 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pondicherry v. Sri Vineet Chudiwala
Date of order
28 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pondicherry v. Sri Vineet Chudiwala, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.1117 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Pondicherry. .. AppellantVersus
Sri Vineet Chudiwala
.. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court u/s 260A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, dated 14.05.2010, inI.T.A.No.696/Mds/2009 against the order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax(Appeals)-XII, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai 34 made in ITA.No.192/07-08, dated 05.12.2008 for theassessment year 2003-04.
against the assessment order passed by the Income TaxOfficer,wardI(2),PondicherrymadeinPAN.NO/GIr.No.ABYPV0258J/5611-V dated 31.03.2006 for theassessment year 2003-04.
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenuehad submitted that they may be permitted by this Court towithdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the CircularNo.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India,dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter isless than Rs.20,00,000/-.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.
sd/-Assistant Registrar(Cs-III)
/TRUE COPY/ Sub-Assistant Registrar
cla/rg
To:
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-XII,121, Mahatma GandhiRoad, Nungambakkam,Chennai - 34.
3.The Income Tax Officer, Ward I(2), Pondicherry.
4.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Pondicherry+1 CC to MR.J.Narayanaswamy Advocate. SR.NO. 5847
CO-AKJD 08/02/2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.