The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune-Ii v. Praviin M. Dugad
High Court
20 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune-Ii v. Praviin M. Dugad
Date of order
20 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune-Ii v. Praviin M. Dugad, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3816 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.726 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune-II
..Appellant.
Vs.Kirit M. Dugad
..Respondent.
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3823 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.727 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune-II
Vs.
Praviin M. Dugad
....
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr. Sudhir Hardikar for the Respondent.
....
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3817 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO2143 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),PuneVs.Anil P. Khinvasara (HUF)
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3820 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.2132 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central) Pune
Vs.
Smt. Surekhabai Sharad Mutha
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
....
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
20[th] January, 2010.
P.C. :
The Notices of Motion are for the restoration of the Petitions which have been dismissed in default for non-compliance with the conditional order dated 23[rd] July, 2009. There is a delay of one day in taking out the Motions which is also sought to be condoned. For the reasons indicated in the affidavit in support, sufficient cause is shown. The Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clauses A and B.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue