Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v. Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 06 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

06 Jul 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v. Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal stands dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABADFARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. TAX APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2008 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune VS Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for the AppellantMr. R.R. Chandak, Advocate for the respondent ... P.C.:- CORAM :SMT. NISHITA MHATRE &M.T. JOSHI, JJ.DATED : 06.07.2011 1. The Appeal has been filed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 31.7.2007. By this order, the Tribunal had remanded the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, on remand the Assessing Officer has decided the matter and an order dated 26.11.2008 has been passed. 2. In these circumstances the Appeal has become infructuous. Appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. Sd/-Sd/- [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.