Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v. Pushpadanteshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,Nandurbar

High Court 01 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

01 Dec 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pune v. Pushpadanteshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,Nandurbar, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 CA11794.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11794 OF 2008IN TAX APPEAL ST NO. 21948 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune. ...Applicant.. Versus Pushpadanteshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,Nandurbar. ..Respondent.. -------------------- Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for the applicant -------------------- CORAM: A. V. NIRGUDE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.DATE : DECEMBER 1 , 2014. PER COURT: Heard. For the reasons contained in the application, the same is allowed. Delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. (V. L. ACHLIYA, J.) (A. V. NIRGUDE, J.) sgp

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.