Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rohtak v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rohtak v. M/S The Atlas Cycle Industries Limited, Sonepat

High Court 20 Jul 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rohtak v. M/S The Atlas Cycle Industries Limited, Sonepat
Date of order
20 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rohtak v. M/S The Atlas Cycle Industries Limited, Sonepat, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. ITA No.92 of 2002 Date of decision: 20.7.2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak -----Appellant Vs. M/s The Atlas Cycle Industries Limited, Sonepat ----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present:-Mr. Krishan Kumar Mehta, Advocate for the revenue.Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the assessee. Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) against order dated17.1.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’,New Delhi in ITA No.3410/Del/94 for the assessment year 1986-87,proposing to raise following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the ITAT was justified in confirming the order of CIT(A) indirecting the reduction of the disallowance made by the AOunder section 37(2A) of Income Tax Act, 1961?” In view of our order passed today in ITA No.161 of 2002 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak v. The Atlas Cycle Industries Limited, Sonepat), the question proposed has to be decided against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. We order accordingly. The appeal is dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge July 20, 2010‘gs’ (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan