The Commissioner Of Income Tax Salem v. Assisted By
High Court
01 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Salem v. Assisted By
Date of order
01 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Salem v. Assisted By, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thepurported questions of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Tax Case (Appeal) No.384 of 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax Salem.
Appellant
Smt.N.Lally
Vs.
Respondent
Prayer :Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 06.06.2006 made inITA No.2643/Mds/2005, preferred against the order of theCommissioenr of Income Tax (Appeals),Salem, made inITA.No.83/2005-06 dated 24.08.2005 and ITA No.82/2005-06 for theassessment year 2002-2003 and 2001-2002 respectively.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan
Assisted by
M/s. Premalatha Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sivaraman
for Mr.S.SridharJ U D G M E N T
(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal.
2.The Appeal has not yet been admitted. The purportedsubstantial questions of law cited in the grounds of appeal areleft open.
3. When the matter was taken up for admission, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appeals
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the HighCourt in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.
4. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thepurported questions of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True copy//Sub Assistant RegistrarvsgTo1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Salem-73. The Income Tax Appellate, Tribunal, Madras 'D'Bench Chennai+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate SR.No.20050+1cc to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate SR.No.19824Tax Case (Appeal) No.384 of 2009MR(CO)GMY(12/04/2019)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.