The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Tds, Mumbai v. M/S.jik Industries Limited, Mumbai
High Court
26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Tds, Mumbai v. M/S.jik Industries Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Tds, Mumbai v. M/S.jik Industries Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1937 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1938 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – TDS, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.JIK Industries Limited, Mumbai
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.Ajay R. Singh for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel for the respondent-assessee.
2.It is not in dispute that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P. Limited V/s. CIT, [2007] 293 ITR 226(SC). The very same judgment has been relied upon by the tribunal in support of the reasons. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue