Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pu...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Pune

High Court 19 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Pune
Date of order
19 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Pune, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.201 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Pune ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 19[th] March 2013 P.C. : 1.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2007-08, following questions of law have been proposed for our consideration. “a)Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that provisions of Section 194H was not applicable in respect of commission payments to PCO franchises ?Section 194H was not applicable in respect of commission payments to PCO franchises ? b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, Pune Bench 'A', Pune was correct in law to cancel the AO's order and in holding that the assessee was not in default for non-deduction of tax of Rs.3,07,59,262/- under Section 194H in respect of commission payments to PCO franchises for F.Y. 2006-07 relevant to the A.Y. 2007-08 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?”Tribunal, Pune Bench 'A', Pune was correct in law to cancel the AO's order and in holding that the assessee was not in default for non-deduction of tax of Rs.3,07,59,262/- under Section 194H in respect of commission payments to PCO franchises for F.Y. 2006-07 relevant to the A.Y. 2007-08 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?” 2.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the issues arising herein was not entertained by this Court in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1512 of 2012 by an order dated 6[th] February 2012 in the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited. In this view of the matter, we see no reason to entertain the proposed questions of law. 3.Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan