The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. The General Manager, Bharas Sanchar Nigam
High Court
27 Feb 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. The General Manager, Bharas Sanchar Nigam
Date of order
27 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. The General Manager, Bharas Sanchar Nigam, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons mentioned in the said Appeal, present appeals stand dismissed. [V.K.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2014INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 85 OF 2014INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune.. AppellantVersus
The General Manager, Bharas Sanchar Nigam .. RespondentLtd., Telephone Bhavan, Latur.
Mr. D.V. Soman, Advocate for the apellant.
Mr. V.D. Sonawane, Advocate for sole respondent.
P.C. :-
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE &
V.K. JADHAV,JJ.27.02.2015
DATED :
1.Heard. These appeals challenge concurrent findings recorded by the authorities below that the demand of the appellant/department made to the respondent company was unjustifiable. Similar issue arose before this Court in Tax Appeal No.12 of 2010. This Court held in favour of the assessee and dismissed the appeal. We perused the judgment dated 13.03.2002 passed by this Court in Tax Appeal No. 12 of 2010. For the reasons mentioned in the said Appeal, present appeals stand dismissed.
[V.K. JADHAV,J.]
[A.V. NIRGUDE,J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue