The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. Vodafone Idea Limited
High Court
09 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. Vodafone Idea Limited
Date of order
09 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Pune v. Vodafone Idea Limited, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Under these circumstances, withoutrecording separate reasons, the present Income Tax Appeal is also dismissed. [ B.P.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 955 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Pune..Appellant
Versus
Vodafone Idea Limited
..Respondent
...................
•Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellant
Mr. Atul Jasani for the RespondentMr. Atul Jasani for the Respondent
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 9, 2019.
P.C.:
1.Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out
forthwith. Re-verification dispensed with.
2.Learned counsel for the parties point out that anotherIncome Tax Appeal No. 958 of 2016 preferred by the Revenueinvolving the same assessee, concerning the same prayersand arising out of the common impugned judgment of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal came to be dismissed by thisCourt on 8.1.2019. Under these circumstances, withoutrecording separate reasons, the present Income Tax Appeal is
also dismissed.
[ B.P. COLABAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue