The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds v. M/S.bharat Bijlee Co.ltd
High Court
05 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds v. M/S.bharat Bijlee Co.ltd
Date of order
05 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds v. M/S.bharat Bijlee Co.ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
ttm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6097 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS.. AppellantVs.M/s.Bharat Bijlee Co.Ltd... Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellantMr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 5TH OCTOBER, 2011.
P.C.
1.Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal. 2. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was imposed by treating the assessee to be assessee in default under section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the assessee failed to deduct tax at source. Admittedly, the order of the ITAT holding the assessee to be assessee in default has been set aside by this court by Appeal No.5532 of 2010 filed by the assessee on 8.9.2011. Since the basic order passed under section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 itself has been set aside, the penalty levied under section 271(1) (C) of the said act cannot be sustained. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.