In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Tds v. M/S.svc Growth Fund Private Limited, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5716 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – TDS..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.SVC Growth Fund Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Subhash S Shetty for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 16[th] January 2013
P.C. :
1.Mentioned. Not on board. Taken up for hearing and final disposal by consent of both the parties.
2.The basic dispute between the parties is whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the interest levied by the assessing officer under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') on demands deleted under Section 201(1) of the Act ?
3.Counsel on both the sides state that the order of the Tribunal be set aside and the matter be restored to the file of the assessing officer to be
decided afresh in accordance with the directions passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) by his order dated 15[th] July 2002.
4.In view of the above, the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 12[th] September 2006 is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the assessing officer for fresh consideration in the light of the directions given by the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) in his order dated 15[th] July 2002.
5.The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.