Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Ya...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Yamuna Estates Private Limited

High Court 22 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Yamuna Estates Private Limited
Date of order
22 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. Yamuna Estates Private Limited, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2746 OF 2008IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1309 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax TDS Versus ).. Appellant Yamuna Estates Private Limited ).. Respondent Mr Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J.&A. P. DESHPANDE, J.DATED: 22ND SEPTEMBER 2008. P.C. The present Notice of Motion is filed for condonation of delay infiling the Appeal. Sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit in supportof the Motion. Moreover, in view of the judgment of the Division Bench of thisCourt in the case of Ornate Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs I. T. O. Mumbai, Notice ofMotion No.2281 of 2008 along with other connected matters decided on 29[th]August 2008, delay is condoned. Notice of Motion made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a). 2.Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly. 3.List the Appeal for hearing on admission on 21[st] October 2008. CHIEF JUSTICE A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan