Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds1 v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds1 v. M/S. Sahara One Media &Entertainment Pvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds1 v. M/S. Sahara One Media &Entertainment Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Tds1 v. M/S. Sahara One Media &Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the demand raised under Section 201(1) and 201 (1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Hence the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 690 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax -TDS1..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Sahara One Media &Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1736 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax -TDS1..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Sahara One Media &Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. Counsel i/by Subodh Kurdukar for Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 6TH JULY, 2011. P.C. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the demand raised under Section 201(1) and 201 (1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal is that the amount paid by the assessee without deducting tax at source was by way of reimbursement of the expenses incurred by Sahara India Entertainment Management Company Limited on behalf of the assessee. If the expenditure incurred by the assessee by way of reimbursement of expenses, then to such expenditure incurred by the assessee the provisions of Section 194C would not apply. In our opinion, decision of the Tribunal cannot be faulted. Hence the appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan