The Commissioner Of Income Tax –Thane Ii v. M/S. Goldgerg Finance Pvt.ltd
High Court
08 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax –Thane Ii v. M/S. Goldgerg Finance Pvt.ltd
Date of order
08 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax –Thane Ii v. M/S. Goldgerg Finance Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: If nothing is done till that date, both the appeals shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
SRK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.984 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income tax –Thane II
V/S
M/s. Goldgerg Finance Pvt.Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the revenue.
Mr.S.G. Dalal i/by Mr. Sudhakar G. Lakhani for assessee.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 8[th] October, 2014
P.C.:
When this appeal was placed before us for admission, Mr. Suresh Kumar submits that the Tribunal has relied upon its earlier order and conclusion therein that is regarding applicability of Section 263 of the Income tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the said power could not have been invoked by the Commissioner in the given facts and circumstances. However, that conclusion of the Tribunal has been assailed by the revenue in another appeal which unfortunately for the revenue, has been dismissed for want of removal of office objections. It is urged that the revenue be now given a chance to revive that appeal by firstly seeking this Court’s indulgence and apply for condonation of delay and thereafter to get the delay condoned. In the event the Court is satisfied that there is sufficient cause, thereafter the Court may give time to comply with the office objections and revive that appeal.
2.Mr. Suresh Kumar assures the Court that all this will be done on or before 13th November, 2014. If Mr. Suresh Kumar complies with this statement made today, then we would allow him to argue the appeal if revived and the appeal which is on today’s board. If nothing is done till that date, both the appeals shall stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.