In The Commissioner Of Income Tax , Thane Ii v. M/S.j.m. Mhatre, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, for the reasons recorded in the judgment cited supra, the appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.83 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax , Thane IIVersus
..Appellant.
M/s.J.M. Mhatre
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 12TH AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. Both parties agree that the question sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered against the revenue by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. S.C. Thakur & Bros reported in (2009) 221 CTR (Bom) 779.
2.In this view of the matter, for the reasons recorded in the judgment cited supra, the appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue