The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thane v. Church Of Our Lady Of Grace
High Court
20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thane v. Church Of Our Lady Of Grace
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thane v. Church Of Our Lady Of Grace, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing the Commissioner of Income Tax to grant registration to the assessee after lapse of 52 years in contravention of the provisions of Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2170 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Thane..Appellant.
Versus
Church of Our Lady of Grace..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 20[th] July, 2011.
1.The question raised in this appeal is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing the Commissioner of Income Tax to grant registration to the assessee after lapse of 52 years in contravention of the provisions of Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.On perusal of the order of the Tribunal, particularly para-10 thereof, it is seen that the Tribunal relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Collector of Land Acquisition V/s. N.S. Katiji reported in 167 ITR 475 condoned the delay by recording that since the object of the Trust and genuineness of its activity that it is for religious and charitable
purposes, being not in doubt, the registration be granted with effect from 1st April 1973. Since the decision of the Tribunal is based on the decision of the
Apex Court, we see no merit to entertain this appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.