Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichy v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichy v. T.r.swaminathan, 25 Odayar Bungalow, Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam

High Court 30 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichy v. T.r.swaminathan, 25 Odayar Bungalow, Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam
Date of order
30 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichy v. T.r.swaminathan, 25 Odayar Bungalow, Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 30.08.2016 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.Justice S.ManikumarandThe Honourable Mr.Justice D.Krishnakumar Tax Case Appeal No.115 of 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Trichy ... Appellant/AppellantVs T.R.Swaminathan,25 Odayar Bungalow,Gandhi Nagar, Kumbakonam ... Respondent/Respondent Prayer:Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 23.07.2014, in ITANo.391/Mds/2013 against the order of the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals, Trichy dt.20.12.2012 against the order of theIncome Tax Officer (OSD) Circle, I, Kumbakonam, orderdt.29.12.16. For appellant : Mr. S.Rajesh, Standing Counsel, for Income Tax.For respondent : Mr. S.Sridhar- - - - - -J U D G M E N T(Judgment of the Court was made by S.Manikumar, J.,) This Appeal has been filed against the order of the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Madras, dated 23.07.2014. 2. The substantial question of law raised in the instantappeal reads thus:-“Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal wasright in holding that Section 40 (a) (ia)can be invoked only to the amounts ofexpenditure which are payable as on lastday of the financial year and not theexpenditure incurred during the financialyear? ” https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Standing Counsel for Income Tax,submitted that the tax implication in the instant appeal is lessthan the ceiling limit fixed by the Circular bearing No.21 of2015, dated 10/12/2015. He further submitted that, as per theCircular, Tax Case Appeals have been instructed to be withdrawn,subject to the matters covered under the circular. 4. Placing on record the above submissions, whiledismissing the Tax Case Appeal No.115 of 2015, as withdrawn,substantial question of law raised is left open. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/Sub Asst. RegistrarTo 1.The Income Tax Officer,Appellate Tribunal,Madras D Bench, Chennai-34. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals,No.44, Williams Road, Cantenment, Trichy. 3.The Income Tax Officer (OSD)Circle I, Kumbakonam. +1 cc to Mr.S.Rajesh,advocate,sr.49110+1 cc to Mr.S.Sridhar,advocate,sr.49267.vgi(co)krd 16/9Tax Case Appeal No.115 of 2015
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan