The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Mumbai v. Maharashtra Scooters Limited
High Court
21 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Mumbai v. Maharashtra Scooters Limited
Date of order
21 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Mumbai v. Maharashtra Scooters Limited, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3598 of 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.898 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – V, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Maharashtra Scooters Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr.Nitesh Joshi with mr.Mitesh Naik i/by Dhru & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 21[st] December, 2010.
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out for recalling the order dated 7[th] December 2010 passed in Notice of Motion No.2613 of 2010. Counsel on both the sides agree that on 7[th] December 2010, the Notice of Motion No.2613 of 2010 was adjourned, however, it is erroneously recorded that the Notice of Motion is disposed off.
2.In this view of the matter, order dated 7[th] December 2010 passed in Notice of Motion No.2613 of 2010 is recalled. The Notice of Motion No.2613 of 2010 is restored to file. Place Notice of Motion No.2613 of 2010 for hearing after the vacation. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed off.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue