The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, Pune 411 044 v. Kinetic Motors Co. Ltd
High Court
08 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, Pune 411 044 v. Kinetic Motors Co. Ltd
Date of order
08 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, Pune 411 044 v. Kinetic Motors Co. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ast
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME-TAX APPEAL(L) NO.2808 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V,Pune 411 044.Vs.
Kinetic Motors Co. Ltd.
....Appellant
....Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, advocate for appellant.
Mr. S.N.Inamdar, advocate for Respondent.
CORAM:- J.P.DEVADHAR AND
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED:- FEBRUARY 8, 2011.
P.C.
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar questions raised by the revenue in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1169 of 2006 has
been dismissed by us today. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue