The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, Pune 411 044 v. Kinetic Motors Co.ltd., Pune-411 012
High Court
08 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, Pune 411 044 v. Kinetic Motors Co.ltd., Pune-411 012
Date of order
08 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, Pune 411 044 v. Kinetic Motors Co.ltd., Pune-411 012, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2610 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1170 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V,Pune 411 044.....AppellantVs.Kinetic Motors Co.Ltd., Pune-411 012.....Respondent.
....Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, advocate for appellant.
Mr. S.N.Inamdar, advocate for respondent.
CORAM:- J.P.DEVADHAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED:- FEBRUARY 8, 2011.
P.C.
1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses
(A) and (B). Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue