In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Bajaj Auto Finance Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5202 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - V, Pune
Versus
Bajaj Auto Finance Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 25[th] July, 2011.
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in
quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The Tribunal in para-4 of its judgment has recorded a finding of fact that the disclosure made by the assessee was complete and there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment and, therefore, reopening of the assessment beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year was not justified.
3.The decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact. No question of law arises from the decision of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.