The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Biostar Pharmaceutical Limited, Pune
High Court
19 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Biostar Pharmaceutical Limited, Pune
Date of order
19 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Biostar Pharmaceutical Limited, Pune, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.405 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax – V, Pune
..Appellant.
Versus
Biostar Pharmaceutical Limited, Pune
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Anil Mishra i/by PKP Legal Solutions for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 19[th] January, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law :
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that furnishing of Bank guarantee amounts to actual payment in view of the provisions of Section 43B ?”
2.The question before the Court is concluded against the assessee by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. McDowellCompany (2009) 180 Taxman 514 (S.C.). In the circumstances, the question of law shall stand answered in the negative, in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court noted above. The appeal is accordingly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.