The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Capegemini India Private Limited
High Court
08 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Capegemini India Private Limited
Date of order
08 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Capegemini India Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1657 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - V, Pune
Versus
Capegemini India Private Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
DATE : 8[th] June, 2011.
P.C. :
1.In the return of income filed for assessment year 2003-04, the assessee had excluded the foreign currency expenses, tele-communication and satellite link charges and insurance expenses from the export turn-over as also the total turn-over for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.The Assessing Officer, however, held that even though the assessee has claimed that the aforesaid expenses are excluded from the export turn-over, as per the definition, the said amount of expenditure have
to be again reduced from the export turn-over. The Tribunal by the impugned order held that once the aforesaid expenses are excluded from the export turn-over, there is no question of reducing those amounts once again from the export turn-over. The decision of the Tribunal is, in our opinion, in accordance with law because, once it is accepted that the export turn-over computed by the assessee excludes the aforesaid expenses, then the question of further reducing the export turn-over by the said expenses does not arise at all. In the result, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.