Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Eagle Flask Industries Limited, Pune

High Court 22 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Eagle Flask Industries Limited, Pune
Date of order
22 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Eagle Flask Industries Limited, Pune, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5756 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - V, Pune..Appellant. Versus Eagle Flask Industries Limited, Pune ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 22[nd] March, 2011. 1.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the questions of law raised in this appeal are squarely covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Laxmi Machine Works reported in 290 ITR 667 (SC). 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan