The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. H.a. Developers
High Court
05 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. H.a. Developers
Date of order
05 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. H.a. Developers, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Issue: DATE : 5[th] February 2013 P.C. : 1.In the appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2002-2003, following question of law has been formulated for our consideration. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the dis-allowance of deduction...
Decision: 3.The appeal is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1735 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – V, Pune..Appellant.
Versus
H.A. Developers
..Respondent.
Mr.N.N. Singh for the appellant.Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 5[th] February 2013
P.C. :
1.In the appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2002-2003,
following question of law has been formulated for our consideration.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the dis-allowance of deduction under Section 80IB (10) amounting to Rs.48,93,196/- to the file of the Assessing Officer and directing him to make fresh assessment on the issues raised in ground no.2 to 5 in the appeal before the Tribunal, in view of the decision of the Special Bench in the case of Brahma Associates V/s. JCIT (119 ITD 255) ?
2.The issue raised in this appeal was also an issue in the earlier
assessment year in which the Revenue had come up in Appeal to this Court in
itxa1735-11
the assessee's own case, being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.981 of 2011. By an order dated 15[th] September 2011, this Court refused to entertain Income Tax Appeal (L) No.981 of 2011 filed by the Revenue, however, the assessing officer was directed that while giving effect to the order of the Tribunal, he shall take into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Brahma Associates reported in 333 ITR 289.
3.The appeal is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.