Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Hemant N. Chohan, Pune

High Court 18 Apr 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Hemant N. Chohan, Pune
Date of order
18 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Hemant N. Chohan, Pune, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.989 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax - V, Pune..Appellant. Versus Hemant N. Chohan, Pune..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 18[th] April, 2011. 1.Not on board. On the application made by the learned Counsel for the Revenue, taken up for admission. 2.Learned counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the questions of law raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Narottam F. Chohan (Income Tax Appeal No.579 of 2001) decided on 26-02-2008. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed. No costs. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan