Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V Pune v....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V Pune v. Jaya Hind Sciaky Ltd

High Court 16 Nov 2010 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Nov 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V Pune v. Jaya Hind Sciaky Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

lgc 1 NM NO. 2601/10 IN ITXAL NO. 901/06. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2601 OF 2010 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.901 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V PuneversusJaya Hind Sciaky Ltd. : Appellant : Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for the AppellantMr. S N Inamdar for the Respondent CORAM :J P DEVADHAR AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATED :16[th] NOVEMBER 2010 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the Motion. 2By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Appeal is restored to file. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [J P DEVADHAR, J]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.