In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - V, Pune v. Klaus Moermann, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3395 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - V, Pune..Appellant.
Versus
Klaus Moermann
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 5[th] July, 2011.
1.Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this
appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the assessee's own case, being Income Tax Appeal No.734 of 2009 decided on 12th June 2009.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue