The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Limited (Formerly Dgp Hinodaya Industries Limited
High Court
07 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Limited (Formerly Dgp Hinodaya Industries Limited
Date of order
07 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
1994-95
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Mahindra Hinodaya Industries Limited (Formerly Dgp Hinodaya Industries Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2462 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – V, Pune......Appellant.VersusMahindra Hinodaya Industries Limited(Formerly DGP Hinodaya Industries Limited)......Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar i/by Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 7[th] January, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has by its order dated 22[nd] May 2008 set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upholding the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal has observed that its attention was drawn to the order passed by the Tribunal in the quantum appeal, by which the Tribunal has deleted the additions on the basis of which the penalty is levied. The Tribunal passed a common order in respect of assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96. The present appeal relates to the assessment year 1994-95. During the course of hearing, the attention of the Court has been drawn to an order dated 9[th] October 2009 passed by the Division Bench in
Income Tax Appeal No.2054 of 2009 pertaining to the same assessee. This Court recorded the statement of Counsel for the revenue and Counsel for the assessee that since the quantum appeal filed before this Court against the order of the Tribunal has been dismissed, imposition of penalty could not be sustained.
2.For the same reasons, which have weighed with the Court while passing the order dated 9[th] October 2009, we find no substantial question of law in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.