In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – V, Pune v. Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The Notice of Motion and the Appeal are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2675 OF 2010
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.642 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – V, Pune..Appellant.
Versus
Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 14[th] December, 2010.
1.The learned Counsel for the Revenue seeks leave to withdraw the Notice of Motion as well as the Appeal.
2.The Notice of Motion and the Appeal are dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court Fee as per rules.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue