In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V v. Finolex Technologies Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
nms3134.10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICEOF MOTION NO. 3134 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3926 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax -V
Vs.
Finolex Technologies Ltd.
..Applicant
.. Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the ApplicantMr. S.N. Inamdar for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 11TH APRIL, 2011.
P.C.
For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion, Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.