In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Kinetic Honda Motors Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1934 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.553 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V.. AppellantVs.Kinetic Honda Motors Ltd... Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr. S.N. Inamdar with Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the Respondent.
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2011.
P.C.
By consent Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clauses (a) and (b).
Accordingly, the present Notice of Motion is disposed of with no order
as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(K.K. TATED, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.