The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Prima Paper And Engg. Pvt. Ltd
High Court
18 Feb 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Prima Paper And Engg. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
18 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Prima Paper And Engg. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 378 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V
..Appellant
Vs.
Prima Paper and Engg. Pvt. Ltd...Respondent
....
Mr. Tejveer Singh, Advocate for Appellant.Mr. Saujukta Choudhary, Advocate i/b P.K.P Legal Solution for Respondent.
....
P.C.:
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.DATED : 18 FEBRUARY 2015
1.This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act') challenges the order dated 29 November 2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the 'Tribunal'). The impugned order disposes of penalty proceedings initiated against the respondent-assessee for the Assessment Year 2000-01 to 2003-04.
2.The question proposed for our consideration reads as under:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was justified in deleting the penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”
3.The Counsel for the appellant states that the appeal of the revenue is covered against the revenue by order dated 12 December 2014 passed in revenue's appeal bearing No. 1644/2012 filed against the impugned order in respect of penalty imposed for the Assessment Year 2000-01.
4.In view of the fact that it is an agreed position that the issue arising in this appeal stands covered against the revenue by the order of this Court, no substantial question of law arises from our consideration. Hence Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J]
[M.S. SANKLECHA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.