The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V v. Versus
High Court
04 Jul 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V v. Versus
Date of order
04 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-V v. Versus, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the said judgment, the appeal is dismissed. [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.471 OF 2006.
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-V. .. Appellant.
Versus
Versus
Versus
Vighnahar Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Ltd. .. Respondent.
....
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant.
None present for the Respondent.
....
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &
S.S. SHINDE, JJ.
S.S. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008.
DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008.
P.C.
P.C.
1. The question framed in this appeal is
covered by the judgment of this Court in (2008)
301 ITR 191 (Bom.).
2. Following the said judgment, the appeal is
dismissed.
[ BILAL NAZKI, J.]
[ BILAL NAZKI, J.]
[ S.S.SHINDE, J.]
[ S.S.SHINDE, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue