Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V,…Appell...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V,…Appellantpune v. Shri Viroba Gramin Bigarsheti Pat…Respondentsanstha Limited, Pune

High Court 15 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V,…Appellantpune v. Shri Viroba Gramin Bigarsheti Pat…Respondentsanstha Limited, Pune
Date of order
15 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V,…Appellantpune v. Shri Viroba Gramin Bigarsheti Pat…Respondentsanstha Limited, Pune, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since the decision of this court has been properly applied, there is no reason to entertain this appeal., Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4912 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V,…AppellantPune. Vs. Shri Viroba Gramin Bigarsheti Pat…RespondentSanstha Limited, Pune Mr. Vimal Gupta, Advocate for Appellant.None for repondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.Date : 15[th] June 2011 P.C. : 1.In this case the I.T.A.T. has deleted the penalty levied under Section 271(E), Income-Tax Act by following the decision of this Court, in the case of C.I.T. Vs. Bandhkam Khate Sevakanchi Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, in Income Tax Appeal No.156 of 2009 dated 18[th] March 2009. Since the decision of this court has been properly applied, there is no reason to entertain this appeal., Hence, the appeal is dismissed. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.) ( J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan